The Best-Looking Modern Sedans

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
08/11/2014 at 23:19 • Filed to: None

Earlier, Leadbull asked us if we thought the Jaguar XJ really is !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! If you ask me, it's one of them. But there are others. Many others. And I figured I would show you all some of my pics, partly because I didn't have time earlier, and partly because looking at a bunch of nice cars is a good way to end the day.

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

As you can see, I prefer cheap, down-to-earth sedans.

And yes, there are a ton I missed. And yes, I already know what one of the first comments will be, I'm just waiting to see who says it.

DISCUSSION (36)

Leadbull > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:23

Kinja'd!!!

Dat Monteverde.... if that's how you spell it.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Leadbull
08/11/2014 at 23:24

"i" at the end.

Milky > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:24

This post contains too much class.

Nibby > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:25

Kinja'd!!!

GeorgeyBoy > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:25

I think you've found all of my weaknesses.

Logansteno: Bought a VW? > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:25

One cannot nominate their own car, especially when it's painted Camry beige.

I think the E38 is a timeless design and is the best looking IMO.

Even though, I really like how the current CTS looks.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Milky
08/11/2014 at 23:27

My name isn't "sm70- why not Spinners?"

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Nibby
08/11/2014 at 23:28

I have gotten bored with the Ford.

Leadbull > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:28

Kinja'd!!!

Close enough.

Sn210 > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:29

yes to all of the above!

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Logansteno: Bought a VW?
08/11/2014 at 23:29

One just did, so there.

It's a damn good looking car.

I was gonna nominate the CTS, but if the LTS has the same styling cues, I think it will be better, so I used that instead.

My citroen won't start > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:30

The A8 has one of my favorite rear designs.

Kinja'd!!!

So balanced and pleasant.

Logansteno: Bought a VW? > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:32

When's the LTS supposed to be revealed? I'm growing impatient to see Cadillac's S-Class fighter!

Milky > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:34

Kinja'd!!!

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Logansteno: Bought a VW?
08/11/2014 at 23:41

I thought Pebble Beach, but I'm hearing New York Auto Show.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Milky
08/11/2014 at 23:44

MrPseudonym > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:55

Kinja'd!!!

Charger. 'Nuff said.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > MrPseudonym
08/11/2014 at 23:57

I actually prefer this. I know it's more boring, but still.

Hammerfrog > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/11/2014 at 23:59

Kinja'd!!!

Honestly I'm a huge fan of the new XJ. It's a giant car, and has a huge presence about it. I absolutely love the citroen-esque rear lights. In fact, probably my least favorite part of the car is the black plastic C-Pillar. Reminds me of the Kia Optima in a bad way.

Kinja'd!!!

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Hammerfrog
08/12/2014 at 00:00

I love the new XJ. I agree, the only thing I don't like are the plastic pillars.

lucky's pepper > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/12/2014 at 00:01

Define modern. This is after all only two years older than the fourth generation Continental.

And for My citroen won't start and his love of the A8's tuckus, feast your eyes on this.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > lucky's pepper
08/12/2014 at 00:02

Oops, forgot that one.

And yeah, I guess anything postwar counts.

Hammerfrog > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/12/2014 at 00:03

Even buildings hate them! http://jalopnik.com/londons-newest…

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Hammerfrog
08/12/2014 at 00:04

Haha I remember that.

lucky's pepper > Leadbull
08/12/2014 at 00:08

Monteverdi. Specifically a High Speed 375/4.

MrPseudonym > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/12/2014 at 00:08

Sorry, but the Charger is the closest I can get to this beauty:

Kinja'd!!!

Oh well, I guess this isn't the "Best Looking Modern Station Wagons" post...

Thing is, dodge gets the front end right for each car. It looks like it fits, like how the happy, funky front end on the Juke fits the Juke, because the Juke is funky and pudgy and just down-right jovial in expression. Where as, the Chevy you posted looks like it has a beard for a grille and is one of those guys who has a beard even though they're not the guy for it. It's like if I wore a purple shirt; that's not who I am. The front end on that thing looks like it should have an unassuming, big lumberjack SUV or crossover, with nice, firm lines, but with nice curving to it, for a body, not a sedan.